عنوان البحث(Papers / Research Title)
Selected Oral Variables in Children of Inbreeding Parents
الناشر \ المحرر \ الكاتب (Author / Editor / Publisher)
زهراء محمد حسين ويس الخاصي
Citation Information
زهراء,محمد,حسين,ويس,الخاصي ,Selected Oral Variables in Children of Inbreeding Parents , Time 10/29/2021 7:59:15 AM : كلية طب الاسنان
وصف الابستركت (Abstract)
Selected Oral Variables in Children of Inbreeding Parents and Children of Not Inbreeding Parents in Babylon Government/Iraq
الوصف الكامل (Full Abstract)
2042??Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, February 2020, Vol. 11, No. 02 Selected Oral Variables in Children of Inbreeding Parents and Children of Not Inbreeding Parents in Babylon Government/Iraq Zahra Muhamad Weiss1 , Nadia Aftan Al Rawi2 1 B.D.S., M.Sc. Student, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Babylon, 2 B.D.S., M.Sc., Ph.D. Assistant Professor, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad Abstract Consanguineous marriage is a relationship between biologically related individuals. Genetic factors have role in gene environment interactions take the center stage. The evidence of oral disease (dental caries, enamel anomalies and teeth wear) is based on the study of inherited diseases, genetic syndromes, familial studies etc.Aim of study: This study was conducted to assess the impact of consanguineous marriage on the occurrence and prevalence of dental caries, enamel anomalies and teeth wear in children of inbreeding parents with children of not inbreeding parents among primary schools in Al-Qasem city/Babylon government, in Iraq Three hundred ninety eight (398) student, 6-12 years old, from 4 primary school, 199 child that their parents of inbreeding marriage (study group), and other 199 child their parents not inbreeding marriage (control group), were included in this study. Dental caries and enamel anomalies were diagnosed and recorded according to World Health Organization criteria (WHO, 1987)(1) (WHO, 1997)(2) respectively in addition, teeth wear was assessed according to criteria of Smith and Knight Index, 1984. A higher percentage of caries experience and enamel defect were recorded in children of inbreeding parents than children of not inbreeding parents. Keywords: Consanguineous marriage, oral health. Introduction Consanguineous marriages have generally been accepted as having important detrimental effects on offspring. There is a lot of genetic research about consanguineous marriage and its detrimental effects on offspring.(4 & 5) Although consanguineous marriages are common in the world, the relationship with oral health status has been thoroughly still investigated. There are many studies found that genetic basis of occlusal trait and dental anomalies through analysis result of inbreeding study in subdivided isolated community, also see the role of heredity, exacerbated through inbreeding, in the etiology of tooth wear(6 & 7). Dental caries is a localized, progressive, irreversible, microbial disease of mineralized tissues of the teeth, characterized by demineralization of inorganic portions, and destruction of organic substances of the tooth. It is a multifactorial etiology related to the interactions overtime between tooth substance, certain microorganisms, and dietary carbohydrates producing dental plaque (8). Most of the oral diseases are complex in nature, resulting from infectious microbial agents coupled with hereditary and environmental factors, with application of newer genetic techniques, an increased understanding of genetic risk factor relationships between dental caries and individual phenotypic expression is coming into light(9). Dental caries was affected by nutrition as seen in study by (10 & 11). Tooth enamel is formed during only a certain period of the tooth development and is irreplaceable. Ameloblasts, which are secretory cells that produce dentalenamel, are particularly sensitive to changes in their environment during the long process of enamel production. Dysfunction of ameloblasts may occur resulting inchanges in the appearance of the enamel in the dentition.(12). Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, February 2020, Vol. 11, No. 02??2043 Materials and Method Subjects: Three hundred ninety eight (398) students, 6-12 years old, were collected from 4 primary school, they were divided into 199 child that their parents of inbreeding marriage (study group), and other 199 child their parents not inbreeding marriage (control group),in Al-Qasem city/Babylon government, in Iraq This study was done during the period from December 2018 to February 2019. A pre-study ethical approval was assigned, also the children’s parent consent form which taken before start the study. Inclusion Criteria: Students with • No history of medication, (anti- inflammatory or antimicrobial therapy) within previous 3 months. • No history of orthodontic treatment. • No history of any systemic disease. Diagnostic criteria included the sex, age and history of family if inbreeding parents or not. Oral examinations was performed on chairs, under good illumination by using dental mirror, probe and dental tweezers Dental caries experience, were diagnosed and recorded according to the criteria of WHO, (1987).(1) Clinical examination was conducted using plane mouth mirror and dental explorer. A systematic approach of the dental caries was performed, starting from the upper right second molar proceeding in an orderly manner from tooth to the adjacent tooth reached upper left second molar, then going to the lower left second molar passing to the lower right molar (WHO, 1987).(1) The developmental defects of enamel index was used WHO, (1997)(2). Enamel abnormalities were classified in to one of three types on the basis of their appearance. They vary in their extent, position on the tooth surface and distribution within the dentition. Ten index teeth were examined on the buccal surface only, if any index tooth is missing, the area was excluded. These teeth include: 11, 12, 13, 14, 21, 22, 23, 24, 36, 46 for permanent teeth and 51, 52, 53, 54, 61, 62, 63, 64, 75, 85for primary teeth was examined according to The Criteria of Enamel Anomalies Results Dental Caries: Table (1) illustrates the distribution of caries free and with caries with among children of inbreeding parents and children of not inbreeding parents. For total sample found that a high percentage of children with caries in study group than control group. The same table illustrates that, children in study groups has a low percentage of caries free compared with children among control group. Table (1): Distribution of dental caries and caries free among children of study and control groups. Groups Caries Free No. (%) Dental Caries No. (%) In breeding 3 (23.08) 196 (50.91) Not breeding 10 (76.92) 189 (49.09) Total 13 (3.3) 385 (96.7) Table (2) illustrates that mean and standard deviation of caries experience of the permanent dentition by age among study and control groups. Table (2): Caries experience of the permanent teeth among children of study and control groups. Age (Y) Groups In breeding Not breeding P value N Mean ±SE N Mean ±SE <=10 DS 114 3.50 .28 136 1.43 .16 .000 MS 124 .40 .18 137 .20 .08 .325 FS 123 .06 .02 137 .00 .00 .019 DMFS 118 3.86 .33 137 1.63 .18 .000 10.1+ DS 65 5.89 .57 59 2.95 .47 .000 MS 68 .32 .21 59 .36 .17 .903 FS 68 .07 .04 59 .12 .05 .492 DMFS 66 6.21 .65 59 3.25 .49 .000 Total DS 179 4.37 .28 195 1.89 .19 .000 MS 192 .38 .14 196 .25 .08 .431 FS 191 .06 .02 196 .04 .02 .308 DMFS 184 4.71 .32 196 2.12 .20 .000 2044??Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, February 2020, Vol. 11, No. 02 Caries experience was found higher mean value in inbreeding group than not inbreeding. Difference was statistically highly significant existed between groups. Decayed surface was recorded a largest fraction of DMFS value compared to MS and FS among both groups with highly significant difference. Regarding MS and FS fractions, statistically, no significant difference was found between study and control groups. Enamel Defect: Table (3) illustrates the percentage of children with enamel defect in study and control groups. The result showed that a slightly the same values were recorded between both groups with no significant difference. According to the gender, the result showed that male had higher percentage of enamel defect than female. Regarding to the age, among children of total sample, the result showed that age (10-12) years old had higher percentage of enamel defect than (6–10) years. Table (3): Distribution of enamel defect among children of study and control groups. Age (Y) Gender Groups In Breeding No Breeding P Value N % N % <=10 Male Yes 41 58.57 29 41.43 .049 No 22 40.74 32 59.26 Female Yes 33 44.59 41 55.41 .750 No 34 47.22 38 52.78 Total Yes 74 51.39 70 48.61 .255 No 56 44.44 70 55.56 10.1+ Male Yes 16 34.78 30 65.22 .000 No 19 79.17 5 20.83 Female Yes 20 60.61 13 39.39 .724 No 14 56.00 11 44.00 Total Yes 36 45.57 43 54.43 .016 No 33 67.35 16 32.65 Total Male Yes 57 49.14 59 50.86 0.640 No 41 52.56 37 47.44 Female Yes 53 49.53 54 50.47 0.995 No 48 49.48 49 50.52 Total Yes 110 49.33 113 50.67 0.762 No 89 50.86 86 49.14 Table (4) distribution of enamel defect scores (number and percentage) among students by age, gender among inbreeding and not inbreeding status. Score 1 and score 3 slightly higher in children of not inbreeding parents than children of inbreeding parents. While score 2 is slightly higher in children of inbreeding parents than children of not inbreeding parents. Statistically, no significant difference was recorded between children of both groups. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, February 2020, Vol. 11, No. 02??2045 Table (4): Distribution of enamel defect scores In study and control groups Age Score Inbreeding Not Breeding Gender Gender M F T M F T N % N % N % N % N % N % <=10 1 33 52.3 32 47.7 65 50.0 29 47.5 38 48.1 67 47.8 2 12 19.0 4 5.9 16 12.3 7 11.4 11 13.9 18 12.8 3 6 9.5 2 2.9 8 6.1 5 8.2 3 3.8 8 5.7 10.1 1** 15 42.8 16 47.0 31 44.9 30 85.7 12 50.0 42 71.1 2 5 14.2 10 29.4 15 21.7 6 17.1 5 20.8 11 18.6 3 0 .00 1 2.9 1 1.4 3 8.5 0 .00 3 5.0 Total 48 44.8 48 48.9 96 46.8 59 55.1 50 51.0 109 53.1 17 56.6 14 46.6 31 51.6 13 43.3 16 53.3 29 48.3 6 42.8 3 50.0 9 45.0 8 57.1 3 50.0 11 55.0 Teeth Wear: Table (5) illustrates the distribution of the children (study and control groups) according to the mean of teeth wear index by age groups. The results revealed that mean of teeth wear higher in control group than study group. According to the age, the result showed the children in age 6–10 years old have higher teeth wear mean value than children in age 10–12. Regarding to gender, the results showed that tooth wear in general was higher among females than males. Table (5): Distribution of teeth wear among children of study and control groups. Age (Y) Gender In Breeding No Breeding P Value Mean ±SE Mean ±SE <=10 Male 1.64 .27 3.81 .44 .000 Female .75 .16 4.51 .45 .000 Total 1.14 .15 4.17 .32 .000 10.1+ Male .83 .22 2.03 .37 .008 Female 1.58 .45 4.03 .94 .044 Total 1.14 .23 3.01 .51 .002 Total 1.14 .127 3.77 .275 .000 Table (6) showed distribution of teeth wear for primary and permanent teeth according to age, gender in children of study and control groups. According to the age, the result showed that children in age 6–10 years old have higher teeth wear mean value than children in age 10–12, with statistically highly significant. Concerning gender, the results showed that tooth wear in general was higher among females than males. 2046??Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, February 2020, Vol. 11, No. 02 Table (6): Distribution of teeth wear for primary and permanent teeth among children of study and control groups. Age (Y) Gender TW Groups In Breeding No Breeding P value Mean ±SE Mean ±SE <=10 Male Perm. .90 .21 3.56 . 42 .000 Pri. .85 .25 .60 .31 .531 Female Perm. . 67 .16 3.10 .36 .000 Pri. .11 .06 1.75 . 52 .003 Total Perm. .77 .13 3.32 .27 .000 Pri. .44 .12 1.17 .31 .026 10.1+ Male Perm. .79 .23 2.03 .37 .007 Pri. .08 .08 .00 .00 .365 Female Perm. 1.33 .42 4.03 .94 .025 Pri. .30 .30 .00 .00 .489 Total Perm. 1.02 .22 3.01 .51 .001 Pri. .18 .14 .00 .00 .209 Total Perm. .84 .11 3.21 .25 .000 Pri. .37 .10 .94 .25 .033 Dental Caries: Generally, there were controversy between studies who searched about caries experience as it was well known that the caries is multifactorial disease and can change from a population to another one, from an individual to another one and even from a group of teeth to another one (14). In the present study, the percentage of caries experience in the siblings of the consanguineous group is (50.91) which higher than non-consanguineous group’s (49.09) in Al_Qasem city. The results of the present study of permanent teeth revealed that the siblings of the consanguineous group had mean of DMFs was (4.71), and the Decay surface fraction was (4.37) which represent the highest proportion of this fraction in the DMFs, followed by MS (.38) and then FS fraction (.06) which represents the lowest one, the siblings of the non-consanguineous group had mean of DMFs was (2.12), and the Decay surface fraction was (1.89) which represent the highest proportion in the DMFS, followed by MS (.25) and then FS fraction (.04) which represents the lowest one. This higher caries in study group than control group could be due to genetic factor in inbreeding marriage (16). The current study was agree with a study done by Elfaki (2015) that was carried out among 120 school age students and their families in Najran – Saudi Arabia (Consanguineous marriage is very common among the inhabitants of Najran), Elfaki found significant association between hereditary factor and the occurrence of dental caries among school children. The study concluded that dental caries experience of children is strongly influenced by hereditary factor and consanguineous marriage could be the source of the genetic factor that behind the high prevalence rate of dental caries (17). Enamel Anomalies: Percentage of enamel anomalies was 49.33% in the siblings of the inbreeding group and 50.67% in the siblings of the not inbreeding group so that there is no significant difference between two groups. The percentage of enamel defect was found to be higher among 6–10 years children than 10–12 years children in both study and control groups. The percentage of enamel defect was found in the present study to be higher among boys than girls for both age groups. This finding is in agreement with Slayton et al (2001)(20). Mestrinho et al (2007) (21), Murad (2007) (22), Masumo et al (2013) (23) and Robles et al (2013) Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, February 2020, Vol. 11, No. 02??2047 (24), while it was disagree with Gatta (2005) (25) and Jabber (2008) (26). Definitive reason for this finding is not documented but suggested to be because of greater intra uterine nutritional demands in boys than in girls, since boy?s weight more, have more muscle mass, and are developmentally delayed both in the uterus and at birth.(27 & 28) Conclusion The impact of consanguineous marriage was recorded on dental caries and enamel anomalies in children of inbreeding parents than children of not inbreeding parents. Financial Disclosure: There is no financial disclosure. Conflict of Interest: None to declare. Ethical Clearance: All experimental protocols were approved under the Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Babylonand all experiments were carried out in accordance with approved guidelines. References 1. WHO. Oral health survey, basic method. 3rd ed. Geneva, 1987. 2. WHO. Oral health surveys. Basic method, Geneva 1997. 3. SMITH, BGN. & KNIGHT, JK. 1984. An index for measuring the wear of teeth. British Dental Journal. 156: 435-438. 4. Bener A, Hussain R. Consanguineous unions and child health in the State of Qatar. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology. 2006;20: 372-378 6. Lauc T, Rudan P, Rudan I, Campbell H. Effect of inbreeding and endogamy on occlusal traits in human isolates. Journal of orthodontics. 2003 Dec 1;30(4):301-8. 7. Normando D, Almeida MA, Quint?o CC. Dental crowding: the role of genetics and tooth wear. The Angle orthodontist. 2012; 13;83(1):10-5. 8. Marya CM. A textbook of public health dentistry. JP Medical Ltd; 2011; 14. 9. Wright JT, Hart TC. The Genome Projects: Implications for Dental Practice and Education, J Dent Educ. 10. Layedh NM. Oral health status in relation to nutritional status among a group of 13-15 years old intermediate school girls in Al-Najaf City/Iraq (Doctoral dissertation, Master thesis, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad). 11. Jameel S, Al-Rawi NA. Assessment of Caries Experience, Enamel Defects, Feeding Types and Area of Residency in Children with Nutritional Rickets. International Journal of Medical Research & Health Sciences. 2018;7 (9):59-65. 12. Lunardelli SE, Peres MA. Breast-feeding and other mother-child factors associated with developmental enamel defects in the primary teeth of Brazilian children. Journal of dentistry for children. 2006; 73 (2):70-8. 13. Kaidonis JA, Ranjitkar S, Lekkas D, Townsend GC. An anthropological perspective: another dimension to modern dental wear concepts. International journal of dentistry. 2012;2012 14. Lara-Carrillo E, Montiel-Bastida NM, S?nchezPérez L, Alan?s-Tavira J. Changes in the oral environment during four stages of orthodontic treatment. Korean Journal of Orthodontics. 2010;40(2):95-105. 15. Peter S. Essential of preventive and community dentistry. 2nd ed. p135-225. New Delhi, Darya Ganj.2004. 16. Bennadi D, Reddy V, Kshetrimayum N. Influence of genetic factor on dental caries. Indian Journal of research in pharmacy and biotechnology. 2014;2 (3):1196 17. Elfaki NK, Brair SL, Alsheikh MA. Association between hereditary factor and dental caries among school aged children in Najran–KSA.2015. 18. Niswander JD. Genetics of common dental disorders, DCNA.1975; 19 (1): 197-206. 19. Maatouk F, Laamiri D, Argoubi K, Ghedira H. Dental manifestations of inbreeding. The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry. 1995; 19(4):305-6. 20. Slayton RL, Warren JJ, Kanellis MJ, Levy SM, Islam M. Prevalence of enamel hypoplasia and isolated opacities in the primary dentition. Pediatr. Dent 2001; 23: 32-36. 21. Mestrinho HD, Fonseca JA, Gomes RR, Souza LC, Acevedo AC, Carvalho JC, Paula LM. Prevalence of enamel dental defects in the deciduous teeth of preschool children in Brazilia, Brazil. EuroP Cells and Materials 2007; 14(2):110. 2048??Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, February 2020, Vol. 11, No. 02 22. Murad NO. Dental caries, gingival health condition and enamel defect in relation to nutritional status among kindergarten children in Sulaimania city. M.Sc Thesis submitted to the College of Dentistry, Sulaimania University, 2007. 23. Masumo R, B?rdsen A, ?str?m A. Developmental defects of enamel in primary teeth and association with early life course events: a study of 6–36 month old children in Manyara, Tanzania. BMC Oral health 2013; 13 (21):1-11.
تحميل الملف المرفق Download Attached File
|
|